Testing AI Products Requires
AI Testing Expertise
Traditional QA tools were not built for LLMs, AI agents, or autonomous workflows. We are among the first QA teams with dedicated expertise in AI product testing, covering hallucination detection, prompt injection, agent safety, and RAG pipeline validation.
You Can't Assert "Correct" With a Simple Test
AI products break the fundamental assumption of traditional testing. The same input does not always produce the same output.
Full Coverage Across Every AI Layer
LLMs and Chat Interfaces
Hallucination detection, prompt injection, bias testing, accuracy benchmarking, consistency checks, and safety boundary validation.
AI Agents and Workflows
Decision accuracy, tool call reliability, permission boundary enforcement, multi-agent coordination, and safety red teaming.
RAG Pipelines
Retrieval relevance, context utilisation, answer grounding, and hallucination rates when context is missing or incomplete.
Smart Contracts
Reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, front-running, gas optimisation. Full security audit before mainnet.
AI-Powered APIs
Function calling accuracy, tool use validation, streaming response testing, latency measurement, and token cost benchmarking.
AI Web and Mobile Features
AI-generated content quality, recommendation accuracy, search relevance, and personalisation correctness.
A Rigorous Process Built for AI Products
What does correct mean for your AI? We define accuracy thresholds, safety requirements, and forbidden output types before any testing begins.
We create a comprehensive dataset of normal, edge case, adversarial, and boundary prompts specific to your use case and user base.
LLM-as-judge scoring, embedding similarity, and custom rubrics evaluate hundreds of outputs automatically and consistently.
Manual adversarial testing for prompt injection, jailbreaks, and safety failures that automated tools cannot reliably catch.
Output distribution analysis across demographic groups and input variations to identify systematic biases in model responses.
Detailed findings with prompt engineering and guardrail recommendations, plus CI/CD integration for ongoing regression testing.
We Find Failures Before Users Do
Red teaming means we deliberately try to break your AI through prompt injection, jailbreaks, and adversarial inputs. Every vulnerability is documented with a guardrail recommendation.
We attempt to override system prompts and hijack model behaviour through carefully crafted user inputs.
We test known and novel jailbreak techniques to find if safety boundaries can be bypassed.
We test whether the model can be tricked into revealing training data, system prompts, or sensitive information.
SaaS company's AI chatbot was hallucinating in 30% of responses
After our evaluation process, including automated hallucination detection, RAG pipeline testing, and prompt boundary analysis, the hallucination rate dropped to under 2%. The client shipped with confidence and zero AI-related support tickets in the first month.
Specialist Tools for AI Evaluation
AI QA Questions
Get a specialist AI QA strategy tailored to your LLMs, agents, or AI-powered features.
Get an AI QA Plan โGPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and any custom fine-tuned models. We also test agents built on LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGPT, and custom frameworks.